Post by jabinkhatun908 on Feb 25, 2024 9:45:57 GMT
But We Also Have Other Examples Such as the One That Concerns the Gradual Loss of Knowledge of the Ancient Greeks and Romans During the Early Middle Ages. In That But I Consider That the Real Challenge is to Study What Was Not Known at Different Times in History. The Historian Alain Corbin Whom He Mentioned Earlier Has Stated and Argued That Measuring Ignorance Constitutes a Firstorder Duty for Historians. Following His Analysis I Consider That Knowing and Understanding Those Who Came Before.
Us Also Implies Measuring What They Did Not Know. Which as I Repeat Many Times Constitutes a Mortal Sin for Historians. If We Opt for a Study of This Type We Must Logically Face the Problem of Sources. And in This Sense We Need Germany Mobile Number List as I Said Indirect Methods. In My Book I Exemplify the Use of Some of These Methods Through a Case of the Detective Sherlock Holmes a Case That by the Way Explains Well Why Historians Have So Often Been Compared to Detectives.
In the Case I Mention Holmes Was Investigating the Theft of a Racehorse . The Sagacious Detective Noticed That the Guard Dog Which He Usually Barked in the Presence of an Intruder Had Not Barked . This Led Him to Draw a Fundamental Conclusion for the Case if the Dog Had Not Barked Then the Dog Knew the Thief. We Historians Can Act Like Holmes. In Fact We Can Use His Method to Reveal What in My Book I Have Called Eloquent Absences . at This Point I Would Like to Tell You That There Are Various Indirect Methods That We Historians Can Use to Study Ignorance.
Us Also Implies Measuring What They Did Not Know. Which as I Repeat Many Times Constitutes a Mortal Sin for Historians. If We Opt for a Study of This Type We Must Logically Face the Problem of Sources. And in This Sense We Need Germany Mobile Number List as I Said Indirect Methods. In My Book I Exemplify the Use of Some of These Methods Through a Case of the Detective Sherlock Holmes a Case That by the Way Explains Well Why Historians Have So Often Been Compared to Detectives.
In the Case I Mention Holmes Was Investigating the Theft of a Racehorse . The Sagacious Detective Noticed That the Guard Dog Which He Usually Barked in the Presence of an Intruder Had Not Barked . This Led Him to Draw a Fundamental Conclusion for the Case if the Dog Had Not Barked Then the Dog Knew the Thief. We Historians Can Act Like Holmes. In Fact We Can Use His Method to Reveal What in My Book I Have Called Eloquent Absences . at This Point I Would Like to Tell You That There Are Various Indirect Methods That We Historians Can Use to Study Ignorance.